An iconic image
Hello from a bit of an absence. I’ve been busy! The campaign has really kicked up in the last two weeks and we are in full swing. And things are going well for the candidate I am working for, everyone on staff is working hard with the Aug. 10 Primary coming up. And the majority of counties have decided to conduct mail-in ballot elections for the Primary, so that means that voter contact is in full swing before the ballots are mailed out July 19.
What has been interesting to observe in this cycle are 2 discussions that have occurred regularly. Discussions about the affects the TEA Party and 9/12 groups will have on the elections and conservative women who are running for office, and who have won their primaries. Although the first topic interests me as much as the second, it is the latter discussion I have been mulling over and would like to blog about this morning.
What makes a feminist? Can you be a feminist and oppose abortion? Or by opposing abortion are you setting a movement back 50 years? I have never really understood why abortion takes center stage in issues of feminism. To me, women’s rights came from the desire to be afforded the same access to opportunity as men. That means breaking the glass ceiling, allowing for equal pay for equal work and not to be discriminated against in hiring practices–that an applicant should be hired based on merit and qualifications, not to fill a quota. As I have gotten older I have realized why the abortion debate has take center stage when discussing issues of feminism. And the point is not so much, from my perspective, that you have the right to do away with the consequence of a bad decision, but rather having control over your reproductive health. This ability has certainly not always been the case, I also do not limit this to abortion exclusively, this is a broader range of topics that include methods of birth control available for women. Giving women the power over their bodies– and in turn empowering them to make informed decisions when it comes to their bodies– and a choice is an argument to be had.
So then can you be a feminist and be pro-life? Does there have to be a dividing line amongst the feminists and anti-feminists on this one issue? I would argue no. That you can argue in favor of life, and still believe in women’s rights.
What then is feminism? Is it about women empowerment? Equality in the work force or a narrowly focused debate over reproductive health and control over one’s body?
What about the idea that as a woman, in a democratic, free society, who has the power of the ballot box in her favor to elect officials who will care about addressing issues that effect women: domestic violence, the subjection of women — in addition to the issues listed above? Is it not the duty of freedom loving women in the West to elect officials who will put pressure on nations who oppress women? Is it to stop practices such as topics discussed in my previous blog about female circumsition and the practice being accepted in the United States. Is it the duty of women of the West to encourage leaders of economic roundtables to employ women and allow their participation in the workforce? Women hold up half the sky as a chinese proverb and recent publication by Nicolas Kristof contend. The power of women when fully employed in the economy has certainly had beneficial results for this nation. This current economic recession the US is in has positively benefitted women as industries that women hold the majority of jobs in have thrived.
It is an interesting conversation that is occurring. And one that I am at a loss presently to answer.
This does not even begin to cover the issue–I am reading Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth and it has opened my eyes to an entirely new set of issues.
There will be more to come on the topic.